ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Susan Estrich: When the going gets tough

From the commentary, "The Congress must act — responsibly. And they will be held accountable in the midterms."

U.S. Capitol
The American flag flies in front of the U.S. Capitol dome on September 10, 2021 in Washington, DC.
(Drew Angerer/Getty Images/TNS)

What do you do when the economy is going to hell, 401(k)s are going down the toilet and we're bracing for higher prices on nearly everything?

If you're an average American, you worry.

If you're Donald Trump, you go golfing, as he did twice last weekend, even as people took to the streets in every major city in the country to protest his policies.

And if you're a Republican senator, you stay up half the night to push through a budget bill that provides trillions of dollars of tax cuts for the very wealthy that can only be paid for by cutting health care for the poor and elderly.

Susan Estrich
Susan Estrich commentary
Tribune graphic

Something is very wrong with this picture.

ADVERTISEMENT

It's hard to find a reputable economist who thinks Trump's tariff frenzy is anything other than economic suicide. That islands inhabited only by penguins were included in the tariff plan is the most laughable evidence that the Trump team simply doesn't know what it's doing. He said he wanted to put a tariff on everyone, and they gave him everyone -- and everything. It makes us — because of them — look like the fools they are.

More Susan Estrich:
From the commentary, "A reign of terror works."
From the commentary, "Ordinary people have been speaking out and have taken to the streets in protest. But we need our "leaders," starting with our former presidents, to speak out. These are extraordinary times. "
From the commentary, "Random acts of intimidation send the message that no one is safe from this administration. And that message has not been limited to the firing of federal prosecutors."

Trump has already said that he doesn't care if prices go up. His Commerce Secretary (who he is reportedly listening to, as opposed to the Treasury Secretary) has said that seniors like his mother-in-law wouldn't complain if their Social Security checks don't come in the mail (maybe because she's the mother-in-law of a billionaire). It will all make America stronger in the long run, they tell us. Clearly, the market does not agree. And that hurts everyone.

Against this background, what the Senate did is even more unbelievable. Working late into the night, they pulled 51 votes together to pass a budget plan providing for more than $5 trillion in tax cuts. Get this: according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, some 45% of the benefits of those tax cuts would go to those making $450,000 a year. The math is easy. Upwards of $2 trillion in tax cuts for the very wealthiest Americans.

And how do you pay for that while increasing defense spending, which the Republicans also propose to do? The Republicans aren't saying. The DOGE boys, with their blunderbuss firings, are only nibbling at the edges. In the Senate, Democrats accused Republicans of setting in motion plans that can only be accomplished by blowing up the safety net. You can't make up for a $5 trillion tax cut by getting rid of the Department of Education or any other discretionary spending. You have to cut Medicaid.

Neither the House nor the Senate bill spells out how the tax cuts are going to be paid for. But independent research leaves no doubt. Under the House version, the Energy and Commerce Committee is directed to find $880 billion in cuts over the 10-year budget plan. But the Congressional Budget Office found that, assuming Social Security is off the table, 93% of the non-Medicare spending under the Committee's jurisdiction is for Medicaid, with an additional $200 billion for the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, even if Energy and Commerce eliminated all non-Medicaid and CHIP spending — which it is not likely to do — "the committee would need to cut federal spending on Medicaid and CHIP by well over $700 billion, nearly 10% of projected spending ... The math is conclusive: Major cuts to Medicaid are the only way to meet the House's budget resolution requirements."

The courts are doing what they can to check the excesses of the Trump administration. Courageous federal judges are literally putting their lives on the line to enforce the Constitution and preserve our democracy. But the economy is not on the court's docket. Saving health care for the poor is not a federal case. If there is to be a check and a balance, it must come from Congress. The Fed, under the able leadership of Jay Powell, will do what it can. But the Congress must act — responsibly. And they will be held accountable in the midterms.

More Commentary:
From the commentary, "Democrats can be as bad in focusing national attention on Trump's growing economic disaster as they were at not touting the fabulous economy Biden left us."
From the commentary, "During the 12 years he served as the head of the Catholic Church, he constantly advocated for the powerless, the downtrodden, the mistreated and the marginalized. "
From the commentary, "If you have flu symptoms — fever, cough, cold symptoms, aches often of sudden onset — get tested for flu (a nasal or throat swab test), especially if you have underlying medical problems, and consult your physician about taking an anti-flu medication."
From the commentary, "It’s time for a new kind of autism research. One that listens to autistic individuals. One that prioritizes health, dignity, and well-being over pathology."
From the commentary, "This time, people told me “hopeful.” Why? They said the actions they have been producing — stronger relationships, deeper trust, and new ways of working together — gave them hope."
From the commentary, "Transitioning to clean energy, reducing plastic waste and increasing resilience to extreme weather are among the most fiscally responsible actions governments can take."
From the commentary, "Greene has exercised her right to dissent in the past, even with the president of the United States. Her constituents have the same right, too."
From the commentary, "Since 1792, the post office has had exclusive rights to deliver letters. Lifting that restriction would open things up to competition and presumably lower prices."
From the commentary, "Despite bipartisan enthusiasm to address online harms, congressional gridlock has continued for years, meaning that lawsuits like the ones featured in Can’t Look Away might be a more effective remedy. "
From the commentary, "Bureaucratic regulators who add to laws passed by Congress, and Congress itself, which grants deductions to some, but not others, are the real culprits."

ADVERTISEMENT

This Susan Estrich commentary is her opinion. She can be reached at sestrich@wctrib.com.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.

Opinion by Susan Estrich
Susan Estrich is an American lawyer, professor, author, political operative, and political commentator. She can be reached via sestrich@wctrib.com.
Conversation

ADVERTISEMENT

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT